点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
“五个一百”，奋斗精神绘就美好生活画卷******
中新网北京2月2日电(记者 邢蕊)习近平主席在2023年新年贺词中指出，明天的中国，奋斗创造奇迹，力量源于团结，希望寄予青年。新时代、新征程、新伟业，实现人民向往的美好生活，更离不开千千万万无畏艰险、砥砺前行的奋斗者。
近日，由中央网信办主办的2022中国正能量“五个一百”网络精品征集评选展播活动进入报送阶段。今年的活动以“团结奋进新征程 同心奋斗创伟业”为主题，征集评选展播一批网民认可、社会认同、影响广泛的网络正能量作品。
浩浩荡荡的历史长河中，唯有奋斗者能镌刻时代的烙印，唯有奋斗者能永葆青春的活力。激扬奋斗精神，绘就美好生活画卷，而那些可歌可泣的奋斗者，其实就在我们身边——
资料图：张桂梅在华坪县女子高级中学给同学们讲话。图片来源：ICphoto奋斗者，新时代下凝聚精气神。人无精神则不立，国无精神则不强。一个民族的长盛不衰、一个国家的屹立不倒，必定有强大的精神力量作为支撑。从邓稼先、钱学森等老一辈的英雄楷模，到张桂梅、黄文秀等新时代的奋斗者，顽强拼搏的“奋斗基因”已经刻在中华民族的骨子里。
百年未有之大变局下，奋斗者发挥着凝心聚力之能。神州大地，他们无处不在的发光发热，激励着亿万中华儿女攻坚克难、勇攀高峰。
资料图：搭载空间站梦天实验舱的长征五号B遥四运载火箭点火发射。 中新社记者 侯宇 摄奋斗者，星辰大海铸就新丰碑。“可上九天揽月，可下五洋捉鳖”，遥远的星辰大海曾是几代中国人的梦想。从1970年，中国首颗人造卫星“东方红一号”成功升空，到2022年神舟十五号航天员乘组入驻“天宫”，开启中国空间站长期有人驻留时代。50多载的漫长岁月，中国航天人克服重重困难，走出了一条自力更生、自主创新的发展道路。
从“东方红”到“神舟”、“北斗”，从“嫦娥”、“玉兔”到“天宫”、“天问”，一座座由中国航天人铸就的伟大丰碑，向世界讲述着中国奋斗者的故事。
奋斗者，追光路上甘为筑路石。电力工人钱海军，几十年如一日坚守在平凡岗位。为千家万户送去光明，是他的本职工作，也是他奋斗的目标。
从事电力服务工作30余年的时间里，钱海军从籍籍无名的普通工人成长为有口皆碑的“万能电工”。他投身志愿服务20多年，为100多位孤寡空巢老人送去温暖，服务用户上万人次。2022年，中央宣传部授予钱海军“时代楷模”称号。
他曾说：“爱是一盏灯，照亮别人的同时，也温暖了自己。”漫漫黑夜里，钱海军用一盏明灯照亮了城市的大街小巷，也诠释了“奋斗者最幸福”的真谛。
奋斗者，榜样力量激励永奋发。高山仰止，景行景止，耳熟能详的奋斗者们不仅点亮自己的人生，更以榜样的形象激励无数青年加入奋斗者的行列之中。
榜样，让无数滴水，汇聚成滚滚洪流；让无数颗星，闪烁成璀璨夜空；让无数星火，燃烧成熊熊火炬，让千千万万个默默无闻、普普通通的奋斗者，共同挺起民族的脊梁、撑起中国的未来，擘画出一副又一副美好生活的画卷。
愿奋斗者勇往无前、青春无悔，愿奋斗者的海洋中，有他，有我，也有你！(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)